<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: positive and negative</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.closecallswithnonsense.com/2009/06/30/positive-and-negative/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.closecallswithnonsense.com/2009/06/30/positive-and-negative/</link>
	<description>A poetry blog by Stephen Burt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:29:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Donald Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.closecallswithnonsense.com/2009/06/30/positive-and-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-234</link>
		<dc:creator>Donald Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 16:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.closecallswithnonsense.com/?p=114#comment-234</guid>
		<description>Interesting, the comparison to Sexton, a poet I dislike, whereas Seidel (so far) does amuse me (I&#039;d never compare him to Dante or Baudelaire, &quot;merely&quot; Lowell and Eliot). But I think one thing Mlinka leaves out of the account of why he appeals to people who don&#039;t read much poetry is: because if his poems are &#039;confessional,&#039; they&#039;re confessional of a life that&#039;s interesting and &#039;shocking&#039; to read about, unlike most poets who spend all their poems talking about a) their lives and family, b) what they&#039;ve been reading, c) local flora and fauna, d) places they&#039;ve traveled to.   The best thing about Seidel is that his poems don&#039;t reek of the writing circle, the MFA crit, the cribbed from the poet we should all try to sound like.  Actually, he reminds me of Bukowski, which is not intended as a slam, though it could be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, the comparison to Sexton, a poet I dislike, whereas Seidel (so far) does amuse me (I&#8217;d never compare him to Dante or Baudelaire, &#8220;merely&#8221; Lowell and Eliot). But I think one thing Mlinka leaves out of the account of why he appeals to people who don&#8217;t read much poetry is: because if his poems are &#8216;confessional,&#8217; they&#8217;re confessional of a life that&#8217;s interesting and &#8217;shocking&#8217; to read about, unlike most poets who spend all their poems talking about a) their lives and family, b) what they&#8217;ve been reading, c) local flora and fauna, d) places they&#8217;ve traveled to.   The best thing about Seidel is that his poems don&#8217;t reek of the writing circle, the MFA crit, the cribbed from the poet we should all try to sound like.  Actually, he reminds me of Bukowski, which is not intended as a slam, though it could be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.closecallswithnonsense.com/2009/06/30/positive-and-negative/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 20:29:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.closecallswithnonsense.com/?p=114#comment-233</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really looking forward to Doug&#039;s posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really looking forward to Doug&#8217;s posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
